Skip to content
Free tool · No sign-up

Free AI content detector for essays and assignments

See how likely your text is to read as AI-generated, which sentences drive that impression, and why. It runs in your browser, explains every signal, and never treats a score as proof.

  • Sentence-by-sentence highlights
  • Private: text never leaves your device
  • Every signal explained
  • No sign-up, no word credits

Get your writing reviewed by an editor

AI content detector

Paste your text to see how AI-like it reads

Analysed on your device. Nothing is stored.

0 / 3,000 words0 sentencesAnalysed on your device

Editor review

Worried your own writing will be flagged as AI?

Formal academic writing, careful editing tools and writing in a second language can all make genuine work read as machine-like. An automated score cannot tell the difference.

An editor in your subject reads your draft, explains which passages sound generic or formulaic, and helps you revise them so the work reads clearly as yours, with every change tracked.

Get my writing reviewed
  • Line-by-line review

    Generic, repetitive or over-signposted passages identified and explained.

  • Your voice kept

    Revisions build on what you wrote, so the work stays your own.

  • Tracked changes

    Every edit visible, so you can learn from it and defend it.

  • Confidential

    Your draft is never stored in a detection database or shared.

What it measures

Eight signals, all explained

Each one is a pattern research and markers associate with AI-generated writing. The report shows how strongly your text shows each.

  • Explainer framing

    The register of newer models: framing text as an article, “X means…” definitions, “connected, but not identical” clarifications and question-style headings.

  • AI-associated vocabulary

    Style words such as “delve”, “underscore”, “pivotal” and “seamless”, which rose sharply in published writing after ChatGPT arrived.

  • Sentence rhythm

    How much sentence length varies. People mix short and long sentences; generated text tends towards a steady, uniform rhythm.

  • Stock phrasing and transitions

    Ready-made phrases like “it is important to note”, and sentences that keep opening with “Furthermore”, “Moreover” or “Additionally”.

  • Specific detail

    Names, dates, figures, questions, examples and first-hand observations: the particulars that anchor human writing.

  • Template structures

    Serial-comma lists of three, “not only… but also” contrasts, repeated sentence openers and paragraphs of near-identical length.

How to use it

From paste to a clear picture in seconds

No account and no upload. The analysis updates as you edit.

  1. 01

    Paste your text

    Add at least 80 words, ideally 300 or more. Longer samples give the signals room to show and raise the confidence level.

  2. 02

    Read the likelihood

    The score shows how AI-like the writing reads overall, with a confidence level that reflects length and how strongly the signals agree.

  3. 03

    See what drove it

    Shaded sentences and underlined words show where the impression comes from, and each signal explains what it measured.

  4. 04

    Revise in your own voice

    Replace generic phrasing with specifics, vary your sentences and cut stock transitions. For assessed work, ask an editor to review it.

Honest limits

AI detector or editor review?

A detector measures patterns. An editor understands your subject and can tell a formal style from generated text.

What gets checkedFree detectorEditor review
AI-associated vocabulary and phrasing
Sentence rhythm and structure patterns
Sentence-level highlights
Understands your subject and brief
Tells formal style apart from generated text
Suggests revisions that keep your voice
Checks accuracy of facts and references
Tracked changes you can learn from

AI detection guide

What students should know about AI detection

How detectors work, how far to trust them, the signs of AI writing, and what to do if your own work is flagged.

01How AI content detectors work

AI detectors look for statistical and stylistic differences between human and machine writing. Commercial tools usually rely on classifiers trained on large collections of human and AI-generated text. Research methods such as Binoculars compare how predictable a passage is to two different language models. Both approaches need substantial computing power and run on remote servers.

This detector takes a lighter approach that runs entirely in your browser. It measures eight stylistic signals linked to AI-generated text, including the explainer framing typical of newer models, the excess style vocabulary that Kobak and colleagues (2024) traced across millions of research abstracts, low variation in sentence length, formulaic transitions and a lack of concrete detail. It then combines them into a likelihood and shows exactly which sentences contributed.

02How accurate are AI detectors?

Less accurate than their scores suggest. OpenAI withdrew its own AI text classifier in July 2023, citing a low rate of accuracy: it identified only 26% of AI-written text as likely AI and wrongly labelled 9% of human writing. A widely cited Stanford study (Liang et al., 2023) found that seven popular detectors classified more than half of essays written by non-native English speakers as AI-generated, while rating native speakers' essays almost perfectly.

Detection also gets harder as models improve and as people edit generated text. Short passages, formulaic genres such as lab reports, and heavily edited writing are especially likely to be misjudged in either direction.

03Common signs of AI-generated writing

None of these proves anything on its own, and good human writers use all of them occasionally. What stands out is when many appear together and the writing could apply to almost any topic.

  • Polished but generic statements that make no specific claim and cite no specific evidence.
  • Style words such as delve, pivotal, multifaceted, underscore, tapestry and landscape.
  • Framing phrases like it is important to note, in today's fast-paced world and plays a crucial role.
  • Every paragraph opening with Furthermore, Moreover or Additionally.
  • Sentences and paragraphs of strikingly similar length and shape.
  • Neat lists of three and balanced contrasts in almost every paragraph.
  • Confident references to studies or statistics that cannot be traced to a real source.

04What to do if your work is flagged as AI

  1. 1

    Stay calm and ask what the concern is based on

    A detector score alone is weak evidence. Ask whether other concerns were raised and how the decision will be made under your institution's academic integrity policy.

  2. 2

    Gather evidence of your process

    Version history in Google Docs or Word, earlier drafts, research notes, saved sources and browser history all show how the work developed over time.

  3. 3

    Be ready to talk about the work

    Explaining your argument, your sources and why you made particular choices is one of the most convincing ways to show the writing is yours.

  4. 4

    Get support

    Most universities have independent advice services and student unions that help with integrity cases. Contact them early.

05Using AI tools responsibly in assignments

Policies on generative AI vary widely between universities, departments and even individual modules. Some ban it for assessed work, some allow it for specific tasks, and many require you to declare how you used it.

  • Read the AI policy for each module before you start, and ask your tutor if it is unclear.
  • Declare any AI use your institution requires you to acknowledge, in the format it specifies.
  • Never submit generated text as your own writing, even after editing it.
  • Check every fact, quotation and reference an AI tool gives you: they regularly invent sources that do not exist.
  • Keep your drafts and notes, so you can show how your work developed if you are ever asked.

FAQs

About the AI content detector

Accuracy, privacy and what to do with the result.

Yes. There is no sign-up and no word credits. The analysis runs entirely in your browser, so your text is never uploaded, stored or used to train anything.

It reliably picks up text with the typical hallmarks of AI writing, such as the sample on this page, and it explains every signal so you can judge the result yourself. But no AI detector is accurate enough to prove authorship, and heavily edited AI text or very formulaic human writing can be misjudged. Treat the score as an indication, not a verdict.

No. Institutional detectors use proprietary classifiers trained on large datasets and run on their own servers. This tool uses transparent stylistic signals that run on your device. The two may give different results for the same text.

Formal academic style, heavy use of editing tools, writing in a second language and following a rigid template can all produce patterns similar to generated text. The detector shows which sentences and signals are responsible, so you can see whether it is picking up genuine generic phrasing or simply a formal style.

The analysis starts at 80 words, but results are much more dependable above 300 words. The confidence label beside the score reflects both the length and how strongly the signals agree.

An editor can review your own draft, point out passages that read as generic or formulaic, and help you revise them in your own voice with tracked changes. We do not rewrite AI-generated text to disguise it, because submitting it as your own would still breach academic integrity rules.

Before you submit

Have an editor review your writing before it is marked

Send your draft and an editor in your subject will review it line by line, flag generic or formulaic passages and help you revise them in your own voice.

  • Fixed quote in about 30 minutes
  • No payment until you accept
  • Confidential by default
Chat now